Iran, Trump and regime change
Digest more
Leaders of Iran’s sizable Kurd population are reported to be mobilizing in the aftermath of joint U.S.-Israeli strikes on the regime, but their ability to mount a successful armed resistance remains highly doubtful.
The only way a U.S. attack on Iran ever made sense was is if its goal was regime change. If the intention is, for example, to compel Iran to do a “deal” then there was no point in attacking. Under the current circumstances,
Opinion
3don MSNOpinion
Does regime change ever work? History tells us long-term consequences are often disastrous
The latest US-Israeli bombings in Iran differ from last year’s, because one of the stated aims this time is regime change. Engaged in the mass murder of civilians at home and fomenting violence abroad,
Even as some Iranians who hoped for regime change celebrate the killing of the country's supreme leader, they remain cautious as bombs fall and security forces stay in place.
For at least a decade, the conventional wisdom has been that direct attempts at regime change by the United States have ended in disaster. And for good reason. In Afghanistan, the very same Taliban that was dislodged in 2001 returned to power in 2021 after ...
President Donald Trump’s strikes on Iran were decisive. His reasons for launching the war and definition of victory have been less clear.
Air strikes alone will not topple the Iranian regime. It is a message the Trump administration has heard ad nauseam.
4don MSN
US military blasts Iranian warship in new video, says regime has ‘ZERO’ left in Gulf of Oman
US Central Command (CENTCOM) has released a new video of what appears to be an Iranian ship getting struck by American weaponry. Two days ago, the Iranian regime had 11 ships in the Gulf of Oman, today they have ZERO.